The Telangana government’s decision to remove the two-child policy for contesting elections has sparked widespread debate across political and social circles. This move is being seen as both a political strategy and a step toward broader social inclusivity.
One perspective suggests that Chief Minister Revanth Reddy’s decision is politically motivated, aiming to secure votes from communities where larger families are more common. Critics argue that such reforms are often timed to influence electoral outcomes, raising questions about the deeper intent behind the policy change.
However, supporters like Kalyani strongly defend the move, highlighting that leadership qualities should not be restricted by family size. She believes that capable leaders with more than two children deserve the opportunity to serve the people and contribute meaningfully to governance.
Another layer of the debate focuses on population and social responsibilities. A participant in the discussion emphasized that a larger population can create stronger accountability for the government. At the same time, he stressed the need for state support in the form of free education, healthcare, and reforms to curb unnecessary medical practices like profit-driven C-sections, which often impact family planning decisions.
The overall sentiment remains cautiously optimistic. While many view the policy removal as a progressive and inclusive step, experts insist that the government must also address the financial burdens of raising children. Without supportive measures, the impact of this reform may remain limited to political symbolism rather than meaningful change for families.
In essence, Telangana’s decision reflects a blend of political strategy and social reform. Whether it will truly empower leaders and benefit society at large will depend on the state’s willingness to back the change with practical welfare initiatives.
